We are happy to report that at the meeting for the vote of the proposed budget, it did not pass.
A resounding NO vote 58-34.
Thirteen votes that were received were not allowed to be counted. At this point, we do not know why. More on the meeting and on the votes later.
Thank you Valle Escondido community for voting no. It is a first step to begin the process of changing our Steering Committee, and a new fresh, transparent, leadership for VE.
8 comments:
How about a steering committee headed by a Chairman that is not a convict and who can live in the community he is representing.. That would be a good start.
So this great SC, led by a convicted felon still on parole who is banned from ever coming back to VE, only got 20% of the vote. This after pulling every string to push the vote to their benefit.
Hey SC only 20% of homeowners support your actions. Why not call for a new election?
Oh, I know why: because if you look at the last minute "books" they provided there are some serious questions regarding not only all the legal fees they are spending using VE homeowner funds to defend themselves for the criminal actions they engaged in, but also that there are funds just "missing" with Olga blaming Rosa for this at the meeting.
There are serious problems with the existing balances and the cash that should be on hand.
Given that Charbit has three properties, Loveless has three, Bill Day two, the three Steering Committee members that are allowed to be in Panama three more. there is a total of 11. So outside of that little group there are only 23 homeowners that support the SC efforts. Sounds like the support is declining.
I take huge issues with someone saying I blamed Rosa, when I was clear that the LAZ accountants had all irregularities and Rosa did not know or was not an accountant to notice irregularities. I will never blame Rosa. She is a great person.
I requested the audit for transparency as I started doing work for VEHOA on April 7 and noticed they had irregular numbers in their balances. LAZ Accountants shall be held responsible for irregularities.
I hope you post this in Rosas defense as the SC and myself fully support her and she is a member of our BOD.
We had CPAs at hand, published results for 2013 and are having an ongoing audit for 2014. How dare someone say such a thing.
Olga
Olga
the meeting was recorded? If that was not what was said you should not be upset. but I understood that the money was used by Rosa not Laz? or am I wrong?
I think I detected a threat? Who authorized Olga to state that if a budget was not approved that would give the VEHOA an open check book? My understanding is an approved budget ALLOWS our money to the spent strictly for line items. If we do not approve how the money can be spent,I am thinking that means NONE can be spent!
Olga, nice try but you know damn well "missing funds" cannot be blamed on accountants. If there are/were any "irregularities" then a full investigation should have been opened including a possible criminal one. This looks like it happened prior to Charbit but he should be well versed in criminal investigation regarding financial "irregularities". Make all the books including bank statements, the complete checkbook and ledger, and all invoices paid out immediately available for homeowners to review. It is not difficult to figure out where "missing funds" went and we homeowners deserve to know exactly what is going on with our funds prior to anyone paying in another dime!
Olga noticed they had irregular numbers in their balances. LAZ Accountants shall be held responsible for irregularities.
The question was where are the backup invoices for the cash expenditures? Who was the treasurer and why did that person not notice cash out no backup?
Post a Comment