If you want to join us to take back VE, where we, the homeowners, actually get to vote on issues of what we want, or don't want, and how our money is spent, please email us with your thoughts and questions to veneighbors@gmail.com. The faster we grow the faster we can make VE the beautiful and carefree place we had before.

Friday, August 15, 2014

Important Concerns over Olga's statements that will effect us all.

Olga, since you seem to be so forthcoming, (your answers to previous questions are below in blue), we ask for additional clarity, so all owners will understand your position with the SC and the VE community, and maybe we can put all these issues to rest as they relate to you.

1) You admit that your husband is working for and getting paid by Charbit which is quite concerning not only because he is your spouse, but more importantly because now many residents have learned, for the first time, that he is also on the real board of directors for the VEHOA. Obviously this is a disturbing conflict of interest. You state that your husband will easily step down if a "suitable" replacement is found. Any idea why the SC has never asked any owners at large for their suggestions, and what is "suitable"? 

2) Are you compensated for any other services from any homeowner in VE and if so, who?

3) You tell us to read your deposition, which is part of the developer’s criminal case against steering committee members, the SC as a group, and the entire VEHOA of which every homeowner is party to. 

Also as part of this case are the copies of over 1,100 text messages between yourself and the General Manager of the Valle Escondido development. 

Please provide us with a copy of both those text messages and the deposition for us to post for the homeowners to view, so all owners can objectively see these conversations in context.

4) It is our understanding that after the deposition you immediately text-ed the General Manager with something like "You are a rat, this is personal now", Is this true?

5) It is also our understanding that in your deposition you never deny sending those messages to the GM which include statements like "wear a bullet proof vest", "I warned them that what they are doing (Steering Committee) is slanderous and criminal", "they hate Thalia", "these people (SC) have very bad intentions", "watch your back", and the numerous "can you meet with me later, I have to tell you things in confidence". Those texts even reference who on the steering committee wrote the slanderous comments against the developer and how the SC voted on it to be published. 

It is also our understanding that the validity of these texts is being proven by the cell phone company, as well as a computer forensics expert. Are you now denying sending these texts messages?

6) Have you ever used aliases in your life, such as Olga Suarez Montero, even if they were never your "legal" name?

7) Your answer sidestepped the question in your response to whether you are aware that your text statements could cause great harm to our community from the criminal, and eventually civil lawsuit, against the individual SC members, the SC as an entity representing all VE homeowners, and the VEHOA itself, of which all homeowners could be held liable. 

You say it will be handled by your private lawyer. What does that mean? Who is your lawyer so we can request a response from him/her? Needless to say, we as homeowners very well may be at risk. Who is paying your legal fees? 

Please understand, many VE owners have reviewed this case with outside attorneys and these matters are much more serious than Mr. Brown is stating to the SC. We are all possibly liable and we have yet to hear that the SC will indemnify the HOA for their actions in these matters. This cannot be taken lightly anymore. 

The VE Neighbors
------
Olgas answers in blue.


A couple of important questions we all want to know from you (Olga) to clarify possible concerns. 

1) Why are you needed to work full time if Rosa worked half the time? How much do you make a month, not by the hour?
My scope of work is completely different. I meet with Engineers to assess issues with infrastructures, I do full accounting administration and other matters besides the email answering and basic translation Rosa did. 

2) What are your last 4 months pay? 
Available at the office for review upon appointment and a member of the SC 

3) Is your Husband employed by Charbit? 
My husband is assisting Empresas Charbit, S.A. in handling the construction only of house 147 

4) Is your husband on the VEHOA board and if so, why? This would be a complete conflict of interest to many of us in VE as owners. 
Yes, upon resignation from Mayita, a new member needed to be on the BOD. He will easily step down if you find a replacement that its suitable.
5) Were you offering confidential & private information to Analia and or Thalia that should have been confidential to the VE community?
FALSE and it is in the hands of my private lawyer. Read my deposition.
6) Are you aware that your text statements could cause great harm to our community from a criminal lawsuit against the SC members? 
This shall be handled by my private lawyer. Paid for by me with private funds to defend my name and reputation.

If you chose to ignore answering these questions, you put yourself in a negative light to the HOA who pay you, not the SC.

Deflection and purposely ignoring important issues are tiring to all of us.

The VE Neighbors 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

How in the hell did Olga's husband get elected to the real HOA board? Was his relationship to her disclosed by the SC prior to the election?
Just great, now not only is the real VEHOA board president employed by the steering committee's self appointed chairman, who is an expelled convicted felon, but so is another board member, Olga's husband.
Do you fellow homeowners realize what is going on here?
I just recently "signed" the declaration of homeowners and was shocked to see at least 70 other fellow homeowners who also feel that this reckless SC must step down immediately.
You all need to speak up now!

Anonymous said...

The homeowners had to vote to approve the first set of board of directors. I don't remember any mention of any real relationship of some of the candidates to any member of the Steering Committee. After everything said and done, it surfaced that Javier and his wife are both employees of Charbit. Such relationship creates a conflict of interest. I don't know much about Panamanian law and I think this aspect should be investigated, clarified, and verified as to the validity of Javier's position with the VEHOA Board of Director.

Likewise this applies to Olga's husband sitting on our Board. Vehoa members were not informed of one board member stepping down, and we definitely were not given the opportunity to vote on a replacement. Instead the Steering Committee decided on a replacement because "they can". That reasoning still leaves a sour taste in my mouth.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone emailed Olga these new additional questions? Possibly she has not seen them and that is why she has not yet responded.
The homeowners of VE deserve honest answers to these ever so important issues immediately. "Talk to my attorney" will not cut it this time and if Olga refuses to provide clarity, as well as the copies of the related documents, she should be fired immediately.

Anonymous said...

Are we privy to her deposition. I don't remember seeing it yet she invited us to read it?

OLGA CARIDAD SUAREZ said...

I answered these before, but yet, you have failed to post them, so here we go again!

1) YOU FIND A PANAMANIAN REPLACEMENT AND REPLACE HIM, THAT EASY, THE OTHER BOD MEMBERS WILL HAVE TO HAVE A MEETING AND ACCEPT HIS RESIGNATION AND MAKE THE NEW APPOINTMENT, AS IT WAS DONE WHEN MS. TOLEN RESIGNED.

2) NO

3) . SLANDER LAWSUITS ARE FILED AGAINST INDIVIDUALS, NOT CORPORATIONS, AS OUTLINED BY PANAMA LAW. THE COPY IS AT THE PERSONERIA, WHICH I AM SURE WILL BE HAPPY TO PROVIDE YOU WITH A COPY

Also as part of this case are the copies of over 1,100 text messages between yourself and the General Manager of the Valle Escondido development. THAT IS PART OF A PERSONAL LAWSUIT I AM FILING AGAINST ANALIA VELASQUEZ

Please provide us with a copy of both those text messages and the deposition for us to post for the homeowners to view, so all owners can objectively see these conversations in context. I DO NOT HAVE COPIES, NOT INTERESTED, MY LAWYER WILL FILE THE NECESSARY LAWSUITS IN REGARDS TO THAT, HOWEVER, THE PERSONERIA WILL PROVIDE THEM I AM SURE.

4) It is our understanding that after the deposition you immediately text-ed the General Manager with something like "You are a rat, this is personal now", Is this true? YES, IT IS AN INSULT, NOT A THREAT, AND I AM ALLOWED TO SPEAK MY MIND TO LIARS, JUST AS YOU DO. IT IS CALLED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. THIS WAS NOT DONE IMMEDIATELY AFTER, BUT WHILE DURING THE DEPOSITION, AND THE PERSONERA AND LIC BONILLA WERE AWARE OF A PHONE CALL I MADE, WHICH SHE DID NOT ANSWER AND THE TEXT. DO NOT SEE THE CRIME IN THAT.

5) THAT IS PART OF A LAWSUIT, THEREFORE, ACCORDING TO MY LAWYER I CANNOT PROVIDE YOU WITH DETAILS. IF IT WAS TRUE, I WILL NOT SPENDING MY OWN MONEY TO FILE A LAWSUIT.

It is also our understanding that the validity of these texts is being proven by the cell phone company, as well as a computer forensics expert. Are you now denying sending these texts messages? AGAIN, THAT IS PART OF A LAWSUIT.

6) IT IS ILLEGAL TO CONDUCT PRIVATE INVESTIGATIONS IN PANAMA, WHETHER I HAVE USED A NAME OR TWO OR THREE, AS I HAVE BEEN MARRIED MANY TIMES, YET NEVER LEGALY CHANGED MY NAME IS REALLY NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS AS IT IS IRRELEVANT TO MY EMPLOYMENT.

7) IT IS NOT SIDESTEPPED, SIMPLY, YOU CANNOT FILE A SLANDER LAWSUIT AGAINST A CORPORATION, HENCE IS A MOOT POINT.

MY PRIVATE LAWYER IS MY OWN BUSINESS AS I DO PAY THAT WITH MY OWN MONEY TO PROTECT MYSELF FROM RENDERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO THE VEHOA. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CONTACT HIM IN ANY FORM AS HE IS PRIVATELY PAID BY ME TO HANDLE MY PERSONAL MATTERS WHICH DO NOT AFFECT AND OR CONCERN THE VEHOA. FAIL TO SEE HOW HOMEOWNERS ARE AT RISK IN REGARDS TO MY PERSONAL AFFAIRS.

Anonymous said...

I don't know why Olga said the blog did not post her answers, they have been posted and dated since Friday as I can see: Olga as you know these are new answers, and as we have said, as long as you are paying your on legal fees!